Safety and Effectiveness of Aquamid as Compared to Restylane for the Aesthetic Treatment of Nasolabial Folds

Completed · Not applicable

Conditions studied: Facial Wrinkles

In brief

The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of Aquamid and Restylane in aesthetically enhancing nasolabial folds 6 months after treatment and to evaluate the safety of Aquamid through 12 months after treatment. The study includes an extended follow up to 24 months.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT00407914

Run by

Contura

People needed

315

Starts

2006-12-01

Expected to finish

2009-07-01

Last updated by the study team

2009-10-08

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

You may qualify if…

• interested on soft tissue augmentation for the nasolabial folds
• moderate to severe nasolabial fold

You may not qualify if…

• sensitivity to anesthetics
• allergy to hyaluronic acid
• previous treatment with permanent fillers in the treated area
• recent previous aesthetic procedure in the treatment area
• infected skin areas or autoimmune diseases affecting the skin

Where it is running

• Study site — White Plains, New York, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.