Comparison of Cephalexin Versus Clindamycin for Suspected CA-MRSA Skin Infections
Completed · Phase 4
Conditions studied: Staphylococcal Infection, Abscess, Staphylococcal Skin Infection, Folliculitis
In brief
The purpose of this study is to help define the role of antibiotics in the treatment of pediatric skin infections caused by community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). The investigators hypothesize that treatment with cephalexin, a penicillin-like antibiotic to which CA-MRSA would be expected to be resistant, does not result in poorer outcomes than treatment with clindamycin, an antibiotic to which CA-MRSA is most often susceptible.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00352612
- Run by
- Aaron Chen
- People needed
- 200
- Starts
- 2006-09-01
- Expected to finish
- 2009-08-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2013-05-13
Who can join
Age: 1 and older, up to 18. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Children between the ages of 6 months and 18 years of age (inclusive)
- Suspected purulent staphylococcal skin or soft tissue infection
- No hospitalization within the previous 14 days
- Must have reliable means of follow-up contact (e.g. working phone)
- Outpatient management in the judgement of treating physician
You may not qualify if…
- Hospitalization on initial visit
- Voluntary withdrawal by the treating physician in order to dictate the antibiotic being used
- Patients with a history of hypersensitivity to or intolerance of cephalexin (or other beta lactams) or clindamycin.
- Patients with altered immunity (inherited or acquired)
- Patients with skin infections related to surgical wounds or hardware.
- Patients currently on antibiotic therapy
Where it is running
- Johns Hopkins University — Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.