Efficacy and Safety of Dexlansoprazole MR and Lansoprazole on Healing of Erosive Esophagitis
Completed · Phase 3
Conditions studied: Esophagitis, Reflux, Esophagitis, Peptic
In brief
This is a study to assess the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified release (MR)(60 mg daily and 90 mg daily) compared to Lansoprazole (30 mg daily) in healing subjects with endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00251719
- Run by
- Takeda
- People needed
- 2054
- Starts
- 2005-12-01
- Expected to finish
- 2007-01-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2012-02-03
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Subject must have endoscopically confirmed erosive esophagitis as defined by the Los Angeles (LA) Classification Grading System (A-D).
You may not qualify if…
- Subject has a positive Campylobacter-like organisms (CLO) test for Helicobacter (H.) pylori.
- Use of prescription or non-prescription proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine (H2) receptor antagonists or sucralfate, drugs with significant anticholinergic effects, misoprostol or prokinetics
- Use of antacids [except for study supplied Gelusil®]
- Need for continuous anticoagulant therapy (Blood Thinners)
- Endoscopic Barrett's esophagus and/or definite dysplastic changes in the esophagus
- History of dilatation of esophageal strictures, other than Schatzki's ring (a ring of mucosal tissue near the lower esophageal sphincter)
- Current or historical evidence of Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other hypersecretory condition
- History of gastric, duodenal or esophageal surgery except simple oversew of an ulcer
- Acute upper gastrointestinal (UGI) hemorrhage within 4 weeks of the Screening endoscopy
Where it is running
- Study site — Hueytown, Alabama, United States
- Study site — Huntsville, Alabama, United States
- Study site — Tallassee, Alabama, United States
- Study site — Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
- Study site — Tucson, Arizona, United States
- Study site — Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
- Study site — North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
- Study site — Azusa, California, United States
- Study site — Carmichael, California, United States
- Study site — Cypress, California, United States
- Study site — Fresno, California, United States
- Study site — Los Angeles, California, United States
- Study site — Modesto, California, United States
- Study site — Newport Beach, California, United States
- Study site — Oakland, California, United States
- Study site — Orange, California, United States
- Study site — San Diego, California, United States
- Study site — Santa Maria, California, United States
- Study site — Littleton, Colorado, United States
- Study site — Longmont, Colorado, United States
- Study site — Wheat Ridge, Colorado, United States
- Study site — Bristol, Connecticut, United States
- Study site — Newark, Delaware, United States
- Study site — Fort Myers, Florida, United States
- Study site — Anniston, Alabama, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.