Cryoablation Versus Radiofrequency Ablation

Stopped early

Conditions studied: Congenital Disorders

In brief

The purpose of this retrospective study is to describe why and when we used cryo and why we crossed over when we used both RFA and cryo. It is also to determine if there is some predictor that would make us say one patient would be better served with one technique than another and to describe our overall acute success rate and then our 6-month recurrence rate with cryo ablation and compare it to our known success rate with RFA.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT00238823

Run by

Children's Healthcare of Atlanta

People needed

50

Starts

2004-01-01

Expected to finish

2004-12-01

Last updated by the study team

2007-05-23

Who can join

Age: any. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

• charts between January 1 and 2004 to December 31, 2004
• pediatric population
• those who were ablated

Where it is running

• Children's Healthcare of Atlanta — Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.