A Phase IIIb Study Comparing Two Boosted Protease Inhibitor-based HAART Regimens in HIV-infected Patients Experiencing Their First Virologic Failure While Receiving an NNRTI-containing HAART Regimen
Completed · Phase 3
Conditions studied: HIV Infections
In brief
The purpose of this study is to compare the anti-HIV efficacy, safety and effect of serum lipids of two boosted protease inhibitor-based HAART regimens (ARV/RTV v. LPV/RTV) in HIV-1 infected subjects who have experienced their first virologic failure while receiving a NNRTI-containing HAART regimen.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00135395
- Run by
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
- People needed
- 200
- Starts
- 2004-05-01
- Expected to finish
- 2006-02-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2010-02-05
Who can join
Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- Patients ≥ 18 years of age infected with HIV
- Plasma HIV RNA ≥ 1000 copies/mL and CD4 cell count ≥ 50 cells/mm3
- Currently receiving a NNRTI-containing HAART regimen or not currently receiving a NNRTI-containing HAART regimen and have not been treated with an alternative regimen since the documented virologic failure (with genotype performed within 2 weeks of the discontinuation of the failing regimen and the genotype report is available)
- The failing NNRTI-containing regimen must be the patient's first virologic failure on treatment and contain a NNRTI and at least 2 NRTIs. The regimen must have been administered for at least 24 weeks and the patient must have documented virologic response to the regimen (HIV RNA < 400 c/mL)
You may not qualify if…
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Reported virologic failure to two or more antiretroviral regimens
- Active AIDS-defined opportunistic infection or disease
- Proven or suspected acute hepatitis within 30 days prior to study entry
Where it is running
- Local Institution — Montgomery, Alabama, United States
- Local Institution — Phoenix, Arizona, United States
- Local Institution — Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
- Local Institution — Bakersfield, California, United States
- Local Institution — Los Angeles, California, United States
- Local Institution — San Francisco, California, United States
- Local Institution — San Mateo, California, United States
- Local Institution — Tarzana, California, United States
- Local Institution — West Hollywood, California, United States
- Local Institution — Norwalk, Connecticut, United States
- Local Institution — Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
- Local Institution — Atlantis, Florida, United States
- Local Institution — Fort Lauderdale, Florida, United States
- Local Institution — Jacksonville, Florida, United States
- Local Institution — Miami, Florida, United States
- Local Institution — Miami Beach, Florida, United States
- Local Institution — North Miami, Florida, United States
- Local Institution — Orlando, Florida, United States
- Local Institution — Plantation, Florida, United States
- Local Institution — Safety Harbor, Florida, United States
- Local Institution — Tampa, Florida, United States
- Local Institution — Atlanta, Georgia, United States
- Local Institution — Decatur, Georgia, United States
- Local Institution — Chicago, Illinois, United States
- Local Institution — Hobson City, Alabama, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.