Comparison of Angiomax Versus Heparin in Acute Coronary Syndromes (ACS)

Completed · Phase 3

Conditions studied: Unstable Angina, Myocardial Infarction, Acute Disease

In brief

The purpose of this study is to show that, when compared with heparin (enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin) and routine GPIIb/IIIa inhibition (either started upfront or at the time of percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\]; Arm A): 1. Bivalirudin with routine GPIIb/IIIa inhibition (either started upfront or at the time of PCI; Arm B) provides non-inferior or superior overall clinical outcomes and 2. Bivalirudin alone (Arm C) reduces clinically significant bleeding. An important secondary objective for this comparison is to show that bivalirudin is not inferior for ischemic complications.

Key facts

Study ID
NCT00093158
Run by
The Medicines Company
People needed
13800
Starts
2003-08-01
Expected to finish
2007-01-01
Last updated by the study team
2007-08-21

Who can join

Age: 18 and older. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.

You may qualify if…

You may not qualify if…

Where it is running

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.