Safety and Efficacy of Two Different Doses of Asacol in the Treatment of Moderately Active Ulcerative Colitis
Completed · Phase 3 · Has a placebo group
Conditions studied: Ulcerative Colitis
In brief
This study is a prospective clinical study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of two different doses of Asacol for the treatment of moderately active ulcerative colitis. In addition, a new tablet formulation will be evaluated at one of the two doses.
Key facts
- Study ID
- NCT00073021
- Run by
- Warner Chilcott
- People needed
- 386
- Starts
- 2000-09-01
- Expected to finish
- 2003-09-01
- Last updated by the study team
- 2015-06-29
Who can join
Age: 18 and older, up to 75. Sex: any. Healthy volunteers: not accepted.
You may qualify if…
- male or female between 18 and 75 years of age;
- have a confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis with the extent varying from proctitis to pancolitis;
- currently demonstrating moderately active disease
You may not qualify if…
- Patients will be excluded from admission to the study if they have/are:
- a history of allergy or hypersensitivity to salicylates or aminosalicylates;
- a history of extensive small bowel resection (>1/2 the length of the small intestine) causing short bowel syndrome;
- current renal or hepatic disease;
- participated in any drug or device clinical study within 30 days of entry;
- currently enrolled in any other clinical study;
- received any oral, intravenous, intramuscular, or rectally administered corticosteroids within 1 month prior to the Baseline Visit;
- received any other topical rectal therapy during the week prior to the Screening Visit;
- received immunomodulatory therapy including, but not limited to, 6-mercaptopurine, azathioprine, cyclosporine, or methotrexate within 3 months prior to the Baseline Visit;
- received a dose of mesalamine-containing compound by any route from which more than 1.6 g/day of mesalamine was available within 1 week prior to the Screening Visit (NOTE: 4 g/day of sulfasalazine and 4.5 g/day of balsalazide are equivalent to 1.6 g/day of mesalamine);
- received antibiotics, other than topical antibiotics, within 1 week prior to the Screening Visit;
- received aspirin (except for cardioprotective reasons up to a maximum dose of 325 mg/day) or NSAIDs within 1 week prior to the Baseline Visit;
- if female, positive pregnancy test, or lactating.
Where it is running
- AGMG Clinical Research — Anaheim, California, United States
- Research Site — Los Angeles, California, United States
- Community Clinical Trials — Orange, California, United States
- AGMG Clinical Research — Orange, California, United States
- Research Site — Sacramento, California, United States
- Sharp Rees-Stealy Medical Group — San Diego, California, United States
- Research Site — Arvada, Colorado, United States
- Research Site — Englewood, Colorado, United States
- Center for Medical Research, LLC — Manchester, Connecticut, United States
- Center for GI Disorders — Hollywood, Florida, United States
- Research Site — Maitland, Florida, United States
- Advanced Gastroenterology Associates — Palm Harbor, Florida, United States
- Research Site — Zephyrhills, Florida, United States
- Southeast Research Associates — Marietta, Georgia, United States
- University of Chicago Medical Center — Chicago, Illinois, United States
- GI Research — Metairie, Louisiana, United States
- Louisiana Research Center — Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
- Digestive Disorders Associates — Annapolis, Maryland, United States
- Research Site — Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Digestive Disease Associates — Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- Metropolitan Gastroenterology Group — Chevy Chase, Maryland, United States
- Brigham & Women's Hospital — Boston, Massachusetts, United States
- Henry Ford Hospital — Detroit, Michigan, United States
- Mayo Clinic — Rochester, Minnesota, United States
- Mayo Clinic Scottsdale — Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov
Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.