Comparison of Surgical Procedures to Reduce Urinary Stress Incontinence

Completed · Phase 2/Phase 3

Conditions studied: Urinary Incontinence

In brief

The primary aim of this clinical trial is to compare the treatment success for two surgical procedures that are frequently used and have similar cure rates, yet have not been compared directly to each other in a large, rigorously conducted randomized trial. The secondary aims of the trial are to compare other outcomes for the two surgical procedures, including quality of life, sexual function, satisfaction with treatment outcomes, complications, and need for other treatment(s)after surgery. Follow-up will be a minimum of two years and up to four years.

Key facts

Study ID

NCT00064662

Run by

Carelon Research

People needed

655

Starts

2002-02-01

Expected to finish

2010-03-01

Last updated by the study team

2013-05-10

Who can join

Age: 21 and older. Sex: female. Healthy volunteers: accepted.

Where it is running

• University of Alabama — Birmingham, Alabama, United States
• University of California — San Diego, California, United States
• Loyola University Medical Center — Maywood, Illinois, United States
• University of Maryland — Baltimore, Maryland, United States
• Beaumont Hospital — Royal Oak, Michigan, United States
• University of Pittsburgh — Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
• University of Texas, Southwestern — Dallas, Texas, United States
• University of Texas Health Sciences Center — San Antonio, Texas, United States
• University of Utah — Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Full record on ClinicalTrials.gov

Trial information comes from ClinicalTrials.gov and is refreshed daily. TrialsForMe does not provide medical care and does not run the studies it lists.